User talk:87.192.16.119

F1 race reports
Hi, yes, language is important. These articles should be written as well as can be. It's worth remembering that if someone reverts one of your edits in good faith, it's bad form just to revert them back. Repeatedly reinstating your preferred version of text (particularly if there's nothing grammatically wrong with the original) is a slippery slope. With regard to style edits, there really was nothing wrong with the original text you removed twice and described as "clunky", particularly as you replaced it with text using the same phraseology ten times. You've now changed some of the syntax, but it could've been done without reverting. Repeats can prompt a revert warning. There's also really nothing wrong with using "of" or "for" instead of "in the", which you've removed twice. One other suggestion: try to avoid using the term "the second Ferrari" (or whatever car) as it can be misconstrued as being driven by a #2 driver, which may not be the case. There are only two of each car, so "other" will do. Trying to enforce minor style preferences is discouraged per MOS:VAR. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)