User talk:87.221.118.60

December 2022
Hello, I'm Kosack. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jesús Seba, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kosack (talk) 08:03, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Telmo Zarra, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kosack (talk) 06:41, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Basque Country women's national football team, you may be blocked from editing. SHB2000 (talk) 10:56, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Basque football derbies, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Fictional Coach Stats
Re Fictional Coach Stats on Spain women's national football team I have again removed the Winning percentage which is being used to falsely to inflate the Head coach stats this is used in the American National Football League and has no place in Association football. Pauseypaul (talk) 13:13, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Jorge Vilda was sacked on the 5 September 2023, not in August 2023
* On 5 September 2023, Vilda was dismissed by the acting president, Pedro Rocha, as national coach, his position as coach had clearly become untenable. He was fired on 5 September. Unless you have an earlier referenced date please don't change the Manager history from 5 September. Pauseypaul (talk) 23:41, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

There is a Principle of relative importance that speaks about the intensity with which these principles should be applied in different cases. The General Accounting Plan determines that: “The strict non-application of some of the accounting principles and criteria will be admitted when the relative importance in quantitative or qualitative terms of the variation that such fact produces is barely significant and, consequently, does not alter the expression of the true image.” That is to say, the application of these principles is softened in some cases as long as they do not alter the faithful image that a company's accounting should give.

Since we do not know the exact previous dates of hiring or end of contract, and we are not looking for uniformity, we apply that principle and consider those 4 days of the month of September to be disregarded.

* Sorry but your reply is an absolute load of twaddle! Your making up your own rules here. Pauseypaul (talk) 15:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I was expecting a compelling counterargument to refute my explanation, but I see that there is none.
 * Thanks for participating.
 * I hope in the future I can be as wise as you. Better yet, I hope all of humanity is, and that they have their only true point of view. 87.221.118.60 (talk) 03:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * It would have been enough to say, for example. Better the exact dates than we know. (Which at first, for the reason, you did not like you) But prefers the public insult and humiliation. Well, you There are with your way of acting. 87.221.118.60 (talk) 04:13, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, I'm Kingsif. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Please explain your edits in future. Kingsif (talk) 01:24, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello! I'm DM5Pedia. Your recent edit(s) to the page Sport in Spain appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  DM5 Pedia  19:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello, I'm Kingsif. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Kingsif (talk) 21:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information.

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of a page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Edit summaries
Please explain your edits in an Help:Edit summary. Not doing so is uncollegial and may lead to your edits being reverted because they are unclear and might be considered disruptive. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 20:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, I'm GrayStorm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Luis Miguel Ramis have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. GrayStorm(User_talk:GrayStorm&#124;Special:Contributions/GrayStorm) 03:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

June 2024
Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Marcelo Otero article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 18:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! And when you are warned, pay attention, don't just make the same change without an edit summary or even acknowledgment.

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information.

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! OnlyNano 17:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Well, Thesse articles are Sptember 2023... and what? I don't have edited these articles since October 2023.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of three months for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC)


 * You have not yet told me what article or what modification you are referring to to justify the blockade. 87.221.118.60 (talk) 03:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.