User talk:87.223.189.179

Albert Celades

 * Third better than official/public statement for an appointment or resignation? Good joke. Please stop deleting edits from others without any justification, and stop writting ridiculous assertions in talk pages with capital letters. --87.223.189.179 (talk) 23:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

No joke, I'm afraid. Please refer to WP:IS, which explains why it is preferred that we use third-party sources. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 00:06, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * I insist, good joke. Are you read the "for an appointment or resignation" part? It is not serious refer to WP:IS to this particular case it is just the opossite. This is a appointment announced by the entity, in fact if the official source had not existed, the third-party source would have been removed from the article immediately due to lack of reliability and would have waited for the official announcement. So this is a ridicoulus distorting of the general guidelines.--87.223.189.179 (talk) 00:51, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * (and it is also a great joke delete and rewrite messages before call an administrator) --87.223.189.179 (talk) 00:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Any reference/response to the written above your laments?--87.223.189.179 (talk) 01:06, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Well, it seems that distort is your hobby. Misrepresenting the guidelines and ignore, distort or simply invent the messages of others in your replies, wich is ridicolus because there are right above yours. There is still no response to the written above.--87.223.189.179 (talk) 01:58, 14 August 2018 (UTC)--87.223.189.179 (talk) 01:58, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * And please stop puttting random and incorrect words in other lenguages with any reason, and waving from Portugal every minute.--87.223.189.179 (talk) 02:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you for respect the last sentence at the article.--87.223.189.179 (talk) 02:14, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Above your laments: ( I insist, good joke. Are you read the "for an appointment or resignation" part? It is not serious refer to WP:IS to this particular case it is just the opossite. This is a appointment announced by the entity, in fact if the official source had not existed, the third-party source would have been removed from the article immediately due to lack of reliability and would have waited for the official announcement. So this is a ridicoulus distorting of the general guidelines. )
 * Later you ignore the message, so I ask a response, you ignored the reply again and reinvented my message saying: ( though you think the website guidelines are a joke ).


 * Then I wrote: ( It seems that distort is your hobby. Misrepresenting the guidelines and ignore, distort or simply invent the messages of others in your replies )--87.223.189.179 (talk) 02:33, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * What?! The history of the edits is right here, all is said and constantly ignored by you. I can't believe this series of ridiculous replies by you, just saiying lies that are contradicted by the text above or even itself. What are you saying with "say things you did not say" if you have written to me wondering about them and copying and pasting the text literally from my replies?!!. You are a massive troll from I can see. Laying even with the evidence of the edit history. Garbling the discussion to hide your ridicoulus responses only makes it exponentially increase. No response and manipulating every time I reply, cool.--87.223.189.179 (talk) 02:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Saying bye with talk page replete of manipulation, replies ignored, no responses to the asked and finally lies in the last messages. Your "fucking best", I belive you, what a trolling performance.--87.223.189.179 (talk) 03:34, 14 August 2018 (UTC)