User talk:87.41.32.2

October 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Burren was changed by 87.41.32.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.94313 on 2012-10-12T13:53:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:53, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Convict cichlid because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 16:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bailieborough has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bailieborough was changed by 87.41.32.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975946 on 2014-05-09T13:34:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:34, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Virginia with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.  B a i l o 26  13:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm Count Count. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Free Stater (Ireland)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Count Count (talk) 11:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tadhg. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tadhg was changed by 87.41.32.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877338 on 2018-10-24T11:14:50+00:00

November 2018
Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed content from OP without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 12:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit to Knockbride appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)