User talk:87.81.147.76

Welcome!


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, although if you wish to acquire additional privileges, simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages, and customize the appearance and behavior of the website
 * Rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed
 * Utilize a vast array of editing tools

In addition, your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! JoeSperrazza (talk) 18:44, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Note
Please be aware of WP:SCRUTINY. --Neil N  talk to me 21:25, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

See Section 2 of WP:NPA
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Islamic calendar. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. SPACKlick (talk) 14:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Islamic calendar. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Neil N  talk to me 15:44, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2015
Your recent editing history at Islamic calendar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Neil N  talk to me 16:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ANI notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your hounding and refusal to accept consensus. The thread is IP editor 87.81.147.76 refusing to accept consensus.The discussion is about the topic Islamic Calendar. Thank you. SPACKlick (talk) 11:53, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Disruption of the RFA process
If you continue to disrupt the RFA process you will be blocked. 14:35, 3 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Can you clarify what you mean by "commenting on the contributor, but not the content"?  When people put themselves up for RfA they expect people to delve into their past and make judgment calls depending on what they come up with.   I don't see what is wrong with linking to this history.   My comments are now in history.   If you feel I have abused this process in any way please point to the links you find objectionable and I will review my comments. 87.81.147.76 (talk) 15:41, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Having printed out and studied the post to the nomination page I can see that something was pasted from Neil's talk which should not have been - the part which begins "You enjoy the company" and ends "should be NailN."  The rest appears to be good faith comment.   If you think I am mistaken in that view please start a discussion here. 87.81.147.76 (talk) 16:21, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If you're checking the diffs on the 14:33, 3 June version of the nomination page, link 31 should be . 87.81.147.76 (talk) 18:56, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  11:58, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Anno Domini, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 17:08, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Anno Domini. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. <b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 17:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Anno Domini shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. <b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 17:21, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anno Domini
did you see the theory that 1AD was the first normal year of the Julian Calender?Scientus (talk) 02:16, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * It's a theory that I don't find very convincing.  Macrobius' account Julian calendar rings true. 87.81.147.76 (talk) 10:59, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hijra (Islam). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. When an editor has already mentioned in the talk-page that Fazlur Rahman mentioned June as Hijra date, how come you are changing it to May by using the same source? - Ascetic Rosé   16:29, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

July 2015
Hello, I'm ScrapIronIV. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Contraction (grammar), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Scr ★ pIron IV 18:12, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.