User talk:88.105.95.100

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (88.105.95.100) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! Frenzie23 (talk) 12:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Gunnar Beck
Re "Beck spent most of his life as an academic. At this stage the importance of his academic work outweighs his political contributions". Yes of course, and therefore any sources discussing his published works can be summarised and included - balanced with any criticisms of that work. What CANNOT be included is one person's personal essay about Beck or his work. WP does not publish WP:OR and unsourced material about a living person MUST be removed. Also Verifiability is a key policy here, which is established by using reliable sources independeent of the subject.

Also removing tags is regarded as vandalism here. I'm not terribly intereested in Beck to be quite honest, but what was there before was a ludicrous collection of unsourced claims about him, not written very well, which did more to make him look a joke than either a serious academic or a serious politician.Pincrete (talk) 13:32, 2 August 2019 (UTC)