User talk:88.110.49.13

Giant's Genre
I apologize if I came off as rude in some of my edit summaries, it's just really frustrating to have to sit there and revert edits over and over again. Is there any way you can stop your un-constructive editing? Category adder :D (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Look I understand you like to edit genres but seriously this band is not a glam rock metal band they are a melodic rock band, This IS constructive editing NOT un-constructive editing...so tell me are Journey, Toto, Styx and Foreigner glam rock? Answer...NO...The only thing glam that you may be confused with is they had longish hair but no way did they ever wear makeup and glam it up come on mate get real...look elsewhere on the internet and there is nowhere else saying that Giant are a glam rock band they are a melodic rock band...You seem to be obsessed with glam rock get over it.


 * It is un-constructive, you're simply removing things to suit your point of view, you MUST provide a source to change any genres on wikipedia. Category adder :D (talk) 15:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Listen your not getting my point and still haven’t realized truly that Giant are not a glam rock band, it’s misleading to say the least for say a purist of this genre they go and listen to Giant thinking oh great not heard of this band but Wikipedia article says they are so I must listen to this...Bam WTF this isn’t glam rock they say it’s corporate melodic rock, I thought by reading your profile you were an intelligent guy but I thinking otherwise now...Go and get an interview with Giant or ask someone connected with the band that know of this bands style of music and they will NOT say glam rock they will laugh in your face because you know in your so called heart of hearts they are a melodic rock band...I’m telling you here this IS VERY constructive that this band is NOT identified as glam rock but IS identified as melodic rock...stop being arrogant and thinking your right because YOU are way wrong this band is not glam rock when can you admit this? you truly don’t know rock music and shouldn’t be on here describing a genre your not knowledgeable about.

Wow, okay go ahead and attack me, means nothing to me. The band’s opinion, your opinion, and my opinion don’t matter on Wikipedia, you must have sources for any genre change.Category adder :D (talk) 17:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

This IS OFFICIAL On his Facebook page which is run by his daughter Martha Rafferty so i suggest you keep the new album in the discography as this is due to be released within the next 6 to 8 weeks...thanks.

The Gerry Rafferty Page 16 April at 09:00 · “Gerry never fails to amaze me. He’s never sounded better” Billy Connolly Delighted to be able to announce today, on his birthday, that a brand new posthumous album ‘Rest In Blue’ will be released in June on CD digipak. Featuring nine original tracks and four stunning cover songs plus one special bonus track. It’s been a labour of love to bring this to fruition by everyone involved and we are truly excited to share it with you all 🙏🏼 Many of the songs were melodies he’d been working on at different stages since the late 70’s but had, in his latter years, come back to as the basis of a new release. In this the tenth anniversary of his death it marks and celebrates the life of one of the countries greatest songwriters. More news to follow soon!

April 2021
Hello, I'm JohnFromPinckney. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gerry Rafferty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. In addition, the fact that the thing you're trying to add produces a redlink suggests that whatever it is is not yet notable enough for its own article, and should not (yet) be added. &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk) 22:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC)