User talk:88.111.145.40

Stats in football players' infoboxes
Hi, when you update the stats in football players' infoboxes please remember that you should also update the pcupdate (or club-update) parameter. This shows when the stats were last updated and prevents editors from accidentally updating the stats again. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 23:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

December 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Royal Pioneer Corps, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 01:43, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Royal Pioneer Corps. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Pioneer Corps, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Royal Pioneer Corps was changed by 88.111.145.40 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885757 on 2020-12-06T02:05:08+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)


 * From No original research: "Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than by the personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The policy says that all material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, needs a reliable source; what counts as a reliable source is described at Verifiability". From Verifiability: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an Citing sources to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution" and "Articles must be based on reliable, third party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy."


 * From Verifiability: "Attribute all quotations and any material whose verifiability is challenged or likely to be challenged to a reliable, published source using an Citing sources. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article. Cite the source clearly and precisely (specifying page, section, or such divisions as may be appropriate). See Citing sources for details of how to do this."


 * From Reliable sources: "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered (see Neutral point of view)" and "Articles should be based on reliable, third party sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish the opinions only of reliable authors, and not the opinions of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves."


 * A user cannot delete sourced content without giving a reason based on a reliable, verifiable source. Otherwise, it is your word (an anonymous user) versus a cited source. You may express comments about the content of the article and needed improvements or ask for comments or help on the article's talk page. See Help:Introduction to talk pages, Help:Using talk pages and Talk page guidelines. See also WikiProject. If there is a project concerning these subjects, you may also ask for help there. Another place to make comments or seek help is Teahouse. If you are contradicting or changing the current text, please cite a reliable, verifiable source for your edit. If there are two points of view, add yours with a citation but do not delete the other one unless your source proves the other view is wrong with absolute certainty. Otherwise, let the reader decide or research it further.


 * Helpful information about editing Wikipedia can be found on various Wikipedia guideline and policy pages including: Help:Getting started; Introduction; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Referencing for beginners; Identifying reliable sources; Citing sources; Help:Footnotes; Verifiability; No original research; Neutral point of view; Notability; Biographies of living persons; What Wikipedia is not; Manual of Style/Words to watch; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:06, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Gab4gab. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Royal Pioneer Corps, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 23:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.