User talk:88.161.50.247

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (88.161.50.247) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 20:50, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Simhadri (2003 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:52, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:35, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shivam (2015 Telugu film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   14:19, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Vunnadhi Okate Zindagi. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Ravensfire  (talk) 15:45, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Munna Michael. - Arjayay (talk) 14:09, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Unsourced genre changes
Hey, I just reverted a ton of your recent edits, because most of them seem to be unsourced genre changes. Wikipedia isn't the place for you to exercise your opinions about movie (or whatever) classifications. We only care what reliable sources say about anything, and for genres, which are totally subjective, we only care what the majority of sources say. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:17, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If you make any more unsourced genre changes like you have again here and here and here, I will probably interrupt your editing privileges. We're not here to entertain your personal genre interpretations. Similarly, we don't care what you think about a film's financial performance. Also, people who "star" in a film aren't supporting characters. Note also that I have a single button that can revert the entirety of your edits, which would be a shame, because I do see some improvements here and there, so please, please, please, go back through your recent edits and find references and submit them. Please avoid genre bloat. Per WP:FILMLEAD, use "the primary genre or sub-genre under which it is verifiably classified." We shouldn't be obsessed with bloating out that section with every possible detail like "action adventure comedy crime fiction spy fiction". Simpler is better. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:39, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Repetitive language
Please stop using repetitive language as you've done here. If an actor plays twins, it can be assumed that it is a double-role without us mentioning that. Mentioning it is needlessly repetitive. You also don't need to say "two twins", as "twins" means "two". Again, needlessly repetitive. Additionally, we don't need wikilinks for common words/ideas like "dual role" and "identical twins". And, we don't use protagonist/antagonist labels as these are largely interpretive, and any question of whether a character is a protagonist or antagonist could easily be clarified by writing character descriptions that indicate protagonist/antagonist behaviors. See WP:PROTAGONIST. Lastly, "(Dual Role)" is not correct capitalisation. "Dual role" is neither a proper noun, nor does it appear to be the beginning of a sentence. Please use "(dual role)" or "(Dual role)" if it makes better grammatical sense. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:23, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced genres, most recently here and here and here and here and here and this obnoxious genre wall, "epic historical period war drama film". What multitude of reliable sources describe the film with that mouthful of interpretive labels? Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DMacks (talk) 15:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2018
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. - TNT 💖 19:57, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Bellamkonda Sreenivas. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:57, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mankatha, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denim11 (talk) 12:57, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notification: Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding below. WaggersTALK  14:23, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm Daiyusha. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chennai Express, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Daiyusha (talk) 11:06, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Longhair\talk 11:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2018
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Here are some examples of the problematic edits:


 * POV editorial about financial performance, "and it was declared an box office bomb". We don't regurgitate the subjective declarations offered by Indian trade mags. We use neutral language. Poor grammar as well.


 * Another editorial about a film's failure and being "declared" a flop. We don't regurgitate the subjective declarations offered by Indian trade mags. We use neutral language.


 * needless wikilink for common concept "space".


 * questionable grammar ("an 2005") and redundant speech like "starring ... in lead roles". Typically the stars of a film have the lead roles.


 * redundant genres "action drama". Action films are typically dramas.


 * redundant genres "war drama". War films are typically dramas.


 * Incorrect capitalisation and needless wikilinks for common concepts "lookalike" and "gangster" It also sounds like two guys are playing one double-role, which is confusing, because what does that even mean? Do we mean that two people are playing double roles?


 * Introduction of "popular" editorial.


 * "With fun and humour" - Why are you editorialising?


 * You add year, but fail to change "an" to "a"


 * Here Tholi Prema is changed from a romantic comedy to a romantic drama. Yet Times of India indicates it as a comedy and as a romance film. This is indistinguishable from vandalism.


 * Here you puffed up the financial response of Tholi Prema from hit to super hit. Kind of a moot point since we don't use that ridiculous language in a neutral encyclopedia. There is no objective way to discern how a super hit differs from a hit, as there is no universal measurement or ratio of budget to gross that would make this fluffy language have any objective meaning.


 * Some aspects of your edits seem constructive, so it's unfortunate that you choose to remain silent. Your persistent silence doesn't do much to help administrators evaluate your ability to understand the problems raised or to gauge your ability to edit constructively.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:27, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

August 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vedalam, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:00, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Nerkonda Paarvai, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)