User talk:88.211.72.27

September 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shamakhi dancers, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Wikipedia does not cancel people and erase them from history, even if their views were hideous by today's standards. —C.Fred (talk) 15:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry but your trite, cavalier attempts at unilaterally dismissing a very legitimate, good faith removal is only going to make Wikipedia less encyclopedic and more of a platform for minimally relevant losers. I hate to have to say this but removing an unneeded, uncritical reference to the 19th century equivalent of a random Stormfront user is a very far cry from "canceling and erasing people from history". If you want to provide an actual rationale for keeping the reference up you'll have to try harder than this. If your comfort zone extends no farther than making boldfaced, manifestly absurd accusations that are plainly bad faith, leave it.


 * One's got to be an actual idiot to not see how giving a platform to a sad little non-relevant writer of the 19th century equivalent of Aryan supremacist fanfiction, one without any literary merit whatsoever, goes against the sort of standards one would expect from an encyclopedia. This is an article about Shamakhi dancers, not one about European phrenology, where such a reference might have some justification. If anything, your reversal of my attempt at keeping the article clean and removing non-relevant sentences with very non-neutral implications is an act of vandalism that shouldn't be tolerated here. Wikipedeans (and any self-respecting encyclopedists) don't cite Steve Bannon uncritically in articles not about Steve Bannon, so why should we include a reference to someone not known in the slightest for writing works of any literary merit on a topic said person has no real relevance to as if it's something actually worth putting in an encyclopedia? 88.211.72.27 (talk) 18:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Shamakhi dancers, you may be blocked from editing. ''The fact that a notable author (regardless of how deplorable their political positions are) mentioned them appears worth mentioning. If you feel otherwise, start discussion on the talk page and wait for consensus. Further, personal attacks against other editors are unacceptable.'' —C.Fred (talk) 20:13, 14 September 2022 (UTC)


 * No one in good faith would think said "author" has any "notability" outside of their despicable writings on race. You're making your own position on this matter as clear as day. As I said earlier, please keep your partisanship off Wikipedia and stop unilaterally removing constructive edits made to bring the article into line with the sort of respectability one should expect from any self-declared "encyclopedia". Pack up your bags and head to Stormfront if you need an outlet for your sort of reactionary buffoonery. 88.211.72.27 (talk) 23:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC)


 * It's hilarious how you have yet to provide a response to the points I brought up in defense of my reversal of C Fred's inflammatory edits to the article in question and still deem yourself justified in blocking me. This sort of childish behavior from you has no place on Wikipedia. Way to abuse your unearned admin privileges. 88.211.72.27 (talk) 23:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)


 * C Fred has engaged in what is clearly an edit war, with no indication on his end of an attempt at getting consensus. While my edits have been backed with solid reasoning, his have relied wholly on reactionary dogwhistling a la Fox News and trite, cavalier absurdities that have no place on Wikipedia. He insisted that I take my proposed edits to the article's talk page (despite the fact of the situations making it obvious that the burden of consensus should be on him, for his stubborn support of inflammatory material) but immediately requested that I be blocked, preventing me completely from making any edits to even the talk page. It should be very clear that he is only preserving what he wants to see- namely, references to idiots that only likeminded individuals as himself could ever see as being relevant or notable in this context.


 * Point to me one example of my "personal attacks" without decontextualing them. Challenge level: impossible! 88.211.72.27 (talk) 23:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)