User talk:88.230.176.66

November 2021
Your recent editing history at Bernard Lewis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 13:46, 26 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Both users are Armenian and they are trying to push their POV. (I think both of them are same person). Please just look at their contribution history.

Do we need consensus to complete a person's arbitrarily cut quote just because someone doesn't like it? Bernard Lewis clearly explains his position there. They don't like it because they want to push Armenian propaganda and full quote is too "revealing". It's just obvious. Consensus doesn't work here either because too many Armenian users (or sockpuppet accounts) lurking on these pages and it's pretty much like trying to write 2+2 is 4 and trying to get consensus for it from people who will just say 2+2 is 5.
 * I've blocked you for 48 hours for edit-warring, POV editing, and personal attacks (accusations of sock puppetry). See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:58, 26 November 2021 (UTC)


 * How is writing Bernard Lewis' full quote a POV editing? I've sourced it and fully wrote what he said. There are dozens of people calling Bernard Lewis this and that quoted, but the person's quote is missing.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as done at Bernard Lewis. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 19:13, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * Not edit warring, truth warring. Watch from beginning to end, he was misquoted despite clear evidence even in the existing archived PDF source, made up sentences were added, and his full quote was cut as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qG70UWESfu4