User talk:88.241.55.210

Using blogs as sources
Hi. I've had to remove the material you added to Mansa Musa because your source was a WP:BLOG. Wikipedia cannot accept blogs as evidence for anything apart from the subjective opinion of the blogger. No matter how true or worthwhile it seems to you, you really need a WP:RS (reliable source) to provide or confirm evidence for opinions or facts offered. Best wishes to you Haploidavey (talk) 11:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC) PS: If the blogger has scholarly standing in a particular field of study, that would usually be confirmed by their peers and publicised in the scholarly press, not self-procaimed by the blogger.

Of particular concern is "contrary to natural assumptions"; the statement is built on an entire raft of assumptions which historians would have no business making. Haploidavey (talk) 11:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Your edit to Mansa Musa has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. ''Although the version that infringed copyright has been deleted, the infringement remains in the history until that, too, is deleted. Do not copy text into articles from other sources unless it's copyright-free. Even then, the source of copied material must be acknowledged in the history; verbatim copies must be very short, and identified s copying by use of quotation marks.'' Haploidavey (talk) 12:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC) https://deeplyread.blogspot.com/2021/06/mansa-musa-richest-man-in-history.html|archive-date=2021-06-13

Your edit to Darien scheme has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Haploidavey (talk) 12:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC) `Source of copied text was https://deeplyread.blogspot.com/2021/06/the-darien-scheme-panama-1698-1700.html