User talk:88.70.23.126

June 2019
Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Avianca Brasil S.A., you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:13, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Embraer, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:58, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Boeing–Embraer joint venture, you may be blocked from editing. MrClog (talk) 17:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notre-Dame de Paris fire
You need to revert your edit here and use the article talk page ~ Mitchellhobbs (talk) 22:09, 14 June 2019 (UTC) Just in case your italian is better than your english ~ Nel caso in cui il tuo italiano sia migliore del tuo inglese Devi annullare la modifica Qui e utilizzare la pagina di discussione dell'articolo ~ ~ Non preoccuparti del ritorno, me ne sono già preso cura per te ~ by the way nice to meet you and I will be glad to help in any way I can so you can understand a little more about english ~ I am at your service ~ regards ~ per il piacere di conoscerti e sarò felice di aiutarti in ogni modo in modo che tu possa capire un po 'di più sull'inglese ~ Sono al tuo servizio ~ Ciao ~ Mitchellhobbs (talk) 22:38, 14 June 2019 (UTC)


 * If you keep trying to edit-war in your senseless changes at Notre-Dame_de_Paris_fire against the opposition of multiple editors, you'll be blocked. Cut it out. EEng 05:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello. I've warned you about this before. Please discuss and achieve consensus before you are blocked.  Dlohcierekim (talk), admin, renamer 14:50, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * It is horrible layout like you guys did, but as you did mobbing against, so leave it horribel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.70.23.126 (talk • contribs)
 * As explained to you several times (e.g. ) you're apparently using an unusually wide screen with distorts the page layout, not to mention that you keep adding a duplicate of an image already in the article . EEng 20:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * no, it is perfect in 1920 x 1080. As you did has a float image in empty space like a comet crossing the universe with none design sense... but your wiki, your bad look. And my image is just made 3 days ago exact 9 months after, so fits nice, however it is understood that wiki hobby volunteers know less about design, layout, appearance, organisation, etc --88.70.23.126 (talk) 20:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Paço de São Cristóvão; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:46, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.