User talk:88.88.108.199

May 2016
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kathy Bates has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Paris Berelc, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:29, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Paris Berelc, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:32, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Paris Berelc. nyuszika7h (talk) 19:11, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 19:41, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Paris Berelc. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:14, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 15:19, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

June 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kelli Berglund. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 19:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * You are lucky that Widr got here before I did, as I was going to block for a month. If you return to the same childish nonsense after this block is over, expect a much longer block. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)