User talk:88.95.209.186

Deny
I have reverted your post at WT:Deny recognition again. I have nothing against IPs although shifting IPs to make the same edit in a short period is not a good move—it just suggests someone with access to VPNs and open proxies and they get blocked routinely. Your comment hits the jackpot by mentioning a troll group, a banned LTA, and a troll victim in a short paragraph. Some thought will show that such a comment should be posted at another website, and not here. However, I am happy to answer your question. WP:DENY is a procedure for dealing with WP:LTA and other useless contributors. WP:DENY has nothing to do with article content. However, a troll would need to do much more than deface a statue to warrant an encyclopedic article. If an incident managed to pass the notability requirement, an article could be written. An article might talk about the hilarity of statue defacement and anything else of an encyclopedic nature that was applicable, but whether what the troll wrote was worth recording in an article would be another matter (WP:DUE). That is, it would be a matter for editorial judgement as to whether the troll's words should be repeated in the article (probably not). I will watch this page for a while and if you want to reply, I will probably notice it. Please do not repeat your question at WT:Deny recognition because I would have to waste time dealing with that in an admin capacity. Johnuniq (talk) 04:28, 2 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The examples I presented are the only ones I could think of and I am not using proxies because I am posting from my ISP and it is not an open proxy or VPN it is ISP in my country Norway. Those are the only examples I could think of as their activities are mentioned on here except for the name of the troll victim because it is not allowed as a BLP violation. I thought of it as an example of how someone could theoretically game it to bypass the sanction against the use of their name or other questionable material. You answered my question goodly and I understand that it must be WP:DUE for the words of the theoretical real-life vandalism to be mentioned. 88.95.209.186 (talk) 04:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Let me know if you ever want an opinion on something. Johnuniq (talk) 05:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)