User talk:88.98.85.216

February 2016
Hello, I'm Wildfowl. An edit that you recently made to Goldman Sachs seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Wildfowl (talk) 01:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Narita Express, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 23:49, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Breitbart News. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - MrX 12:00, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Turkish Airlines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 11:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

edit war warning
Your recent editing history at Michael Shrimpton shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 20:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Overlinked terms
Just a quick note, general consensus is that large geographical names like United Kingdom are not normally linked in an article - see MOS:OVERLINK. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:55, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Overlinking - again
I have reverted a few of your edits, for overlinking - so I have come to explain the reason, although I see you have already been warned about this above. As explained at ‎ WP:OVERLINKING we do not normally link:- There are many articles where these are already, incorrectly, linked; however, car is a common word, Europe is a major geographical feature and British is a major nationality, so these should not be linked - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 16:47, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Everyday words understood by most readers.
 * Names familiar to most readers, including;- major geographical features, major countries, major cities, major languages, major nationalities/ethnicities and major religions
 * Common units of measurement and dates

October 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Shaun Bailey has been reverted. Your edit here to Shaun Bailey was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/ShaunBailey) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:43, 2 October 2018 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

January 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vietnam Airlines, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 00:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vietnam Airlines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 00:05, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Vietnam Airlines, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 23:50, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Vietnam Airlines. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 23:51, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2020
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to William Cobbett, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 09:55, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Across 110th Street, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 08:53, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Overlinking
See WP:OVERLINKING - simply, don't link common terms like country names. 10mmsocket (talk) 12:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

"correct linking"
Hi,

I noticed a few of your recent edits using the edit summary "correct linking" that seem to go against the advice at WP:NOTBROKEN, MOS:NOPIPE and WP:NOPIPE. Redirected links are generally fine, and it's not generally recommended to replace them with piped links. So according to those guidelines,  is actually preferable to, for example, and   is preferred over.

Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 21:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

Just a friendly reminder. Your recent edit at "Inner Temple" changed  to. MOS:NOPIPE says "do not use a piped link where it is possible to use a redirected term that fits well within the scope of the text." That is to say, it was actually correct before you changed it.

Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 23:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah, this joke again. Don't you have anything better to do, Jean-de-Nivelle? The Banner  talk 23:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Just for clarity, let me quote a very brief excerpt from WP:NOPIPE:

❌

✅

Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear IP, you can just keep adding content. Adding well sourced quality content is far better for the encyclopedia than this busy-body thingy that adds nothing. The Banner talk 05:41, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * For the record, Jean-de-Nivelle is correct about what the guidelines says; The Banner is opposed to the guidelines saying or meaning what they do, and this is under discussion over here, where The Banner is not meeting with agreement from, well, anyone. That said, The Banner is correct that adding "well[-]sourced[,] quality content" is what is most important, and you need not really pay much attention to our style guide (which is mostly for later cleanup by other editors who care to do cleanup work), even if people raise quibbles with you about it. Just don't do what The Banner does, which is interfere with and revert people who clean up the content to comply with the guidelines. That's liable to get him in trouble soon if it does not stop. There's a difference between adding new material without regard for style-guideline compliance, and intentionally changing compliant material to be non-compliant. Don't confuse them as The Banner does.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:31, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * While there's no doubt that "adding well sourced quality content" is important, it's also not something that everyone is good at or interested in. Wikipedia is a collective endeavour, and we all have different skills and interests. Our IP friend is interested in linking, and so am I. I didn't intend my remarks above as quibbling, rather as a friendly nudge towards the relevant guidelines. I hope that came across. Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 11:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Sure, I just didn't want to give the impression The Banner is wrong on everything, just wrong on a particular matter. :-)  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  18:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Removal of sources
When a route starts, it is enough to remove that date. Leave the source in place. We want a reliable, sourced encyclopedia. And I assume you agree with that goal, don't you? The Banner talk 10:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Jaguar XJ (X350) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  -  Sumanuil  '''. ''' (talk to me) 20:57, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Jaguar XJ (X350) in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  -  Sumanuil  '''. ''' (talk to me) 21:49, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Dead links
Hi,

If you find a reference with a dead link like the one at Range Rover (P38A), please don't delete it. Either fix it, as described at WP:DEADREF, or tag the link with and somebody else will fix it. I've replaced the link in the reference you deleted with an archived version of the same page.

Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 19:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC)