User talk:88octopus88

Welcome!
Hello, 88octopus88, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Moonraker (talk) 02:32, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Welcome from me too. I see that you have been making grammar and punctuation corrections. The full Manual of Style is a useful resource. --Boson (talk) 23:34, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Clementine Churchill
I will revert you on sight until you get consensus on the article's talk page. Thank You. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 20:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Abelian
In a section of Abelian group, you have capitalized the adjective "abelian". This is not coherent with the remainder of the article, with many others Wikipedia articles, and the mathematical tradition. So, please, revert your edit yourselve. Thanks for doing that. D.Lazard (talk) 13:26, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Good Samaritan law, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 19:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello,thanks, I forgot to add the source,but the murder was reported by several newspapers with sequence photos including the crowds watching and it has been classed as a failure of this law to change the society. I will add it asap. 88octopus88 (talk) 17:45, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The bigger problem would be combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. It's inappropriate to say that a law was enacted but a particular event still happened, as if to suggest that the law was ineffective. The WP:SYNTHESIS essay uses a very similar example about not being able to juxtapose the objective of the United Nations with the fact that a particular number of wars have happened. --Lord Belbury (talk) 17:58, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)