User talk:89.106.224.45

Organising secretary
Hello, I'm Worldbruce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, B. M. Muzammel Haque, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:53, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Successor
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to B. M. Muzammel Haque, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. (1) Biographies of office holders routinely list their successors, if known. Iqbal Hossain Apu succeeded B. M. Muzammel Haque as MP for Shariatpur-1 as a results of the 2018 general election. This can be seen in election results from The Daily Star, as cited in the article. (2) The word "organising" should not be capitalized, per MOS:JOBTITLES. (3) If it was his third term as organising secretary, then the burden is on you, as the editor adding content, to prove it by citing a reliable published source. See Help:Referencing for beginners if you don't know how to do so. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:33, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at B. M. Muzammel Haque, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.  J 947 &thinsp;(c) , at 03:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Style, neutral point of view, and verifiability
--Worldbruce (talk) 05:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) After the first mention of his name, B. M. Muzammel Haque should be referred to by surname only, per MOS:SURNAME.
 * 2) There are problems with using the word "landslide". It is opinion. Landslide victory has no objective definition, no percentage of the vote at which a victory is unanimously considered overwhelming. It is a peacock word, one which puffs up the importance of the subject without giving the reader clear and specific information. Such language may not be used in Wikipedia's voice.
 * 3) 64.1% may be inaccurate. The Daily Star, cited in the article, reports 63.85%. The 2008 election was unique because it gave voters the choice of "no vote". The higher percentage may fail to correctly account for those "no votes". Featured articles about politicians don't usually mention percentages. When they do they almost always round to the nearest percentage point. For these reasons, use 64%.
 * 4) With regard to his being an organising secretary, the article may not say "for the third time" unless you cite a reliable published source to that effect. It is desirable for Wikipedia articles to be accurate, but it they are required to be verifiable. The essence of this is captured in the essay Verifiability, not truth. It is better for an article to be incomplete than for readers to be unable to verify the statements in it.
 * 5) With regard to the 2018 Awami League nomination for Shariatpur-1, that Haque faced opposition from local party leaders is a fair summary of the fact that he ran against five opponents, four of whom held local leadership posts (upazila parishad chairman, mayor). Journalist Kazi Nazrul Islam, writing in the Dhaka Tribune, found the internal party dispute worth noting, so the Wikipedia article should mention it.
 * On the fourth point, I've done your work for you, finding a news article from 2009 (where his name is transliterated as BM Mojammel Huq) saying that he was named an organising secretary then, and a 2016 source that is more complete than the one previously cited, in that it indicates he was an incumbent in 2016. If you don't know how to do research or cite sources, you can get help on the article talk page or elsewhere, but do not make edits to the article that you cannot support by citing reliable published sources. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.