User talk:89.127.11.119

April 2021
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Subtitle Edit—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawn (talk) 13:45, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Subtitle Edit. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 15:53, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Subtitle Edit have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:56, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Subtitle Edit was changed by 89.127.11.119 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958704 on 2021-04-12T20:56:12+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Subtitle Edit. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 15:20, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at LazyTown, you may be blocked from editing. Dirkbb (talk) 19:10, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Julie Lemieux. QuantumRealm  (meow • pawtrack) 19:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Izno (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 08:33, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Big Knights, you may be blocked from editing. DanielRigal (talk) 23:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! DanielRigal (talk) 23:16, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Big Knights.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 15:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Spencer T• C 17:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

June 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:09, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.