User talk:89.200.15.69

January 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at NikkieTutorials. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 13:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * Information orange.svge refrain from pushing your personal opinion and accusing others of vandalism with this activism. You should have posted justification for the revert on the talk page, instead of attacking me personally.
 * Reliable sources are required and none have been provided for Nikkie being legally female. The fact that Nikkie has Y-chromosomes is sourced though, there is a lenghty video about this (link is already in the article). The video says nothing about having a birth certificate changed. Reverting my edit without providing a source would be UNCONSTRUCTIVE.
 * 89.200.15.69 (talk) 13:41, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The message I left was a template, I have left hundreds of the exact same message on many other users talk pages. We go by what the SUBJECT says they identify as. Not by what they are biologically or legally, so because she identifies as female, we say as such. Nikkie is a she, not a he.  LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 16:32, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * 89.200.15.69 (talk) 13:41, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The message I left was a template, I have left hundreds of the exact same message on many other users talk pages. We go by what the SUBJECT says they identify as. Not by what they are biologically or legally, so because she identifies as female, we say as such. Nikkie is a she, not a he.  LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 16:32, 17 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Maybe it is just a template to you, but someone else is abusing it for their activism. They keep putting the false acquisitions back. Would probably be a good idea to create a template that tells people about the Manual of Style. Anyway I am about to catch a train and my laptop 4G is going to roam to a completely different ISP. I will probably not be coming back to this talk page.

The section of that was closed, please start a new section if you wish to futher debate. LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 16:38, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

THere is no need for consense, source was not a RS. There is nonthing to discuse. if you wish to report me, here are links to do so. WP:ANI WP:AVI LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 16:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC) I was not referring to you, I have no reason to report you. I just asked you not to accuse me of vandalism. Others are abusing these templates for their activism. (OFFTOPIC: I was actually the first to tell the editor that gossip is not a reliable source, discussion about that should remain on Talk:NikkieTutorials however). 89.200.15.69 (talk) 17:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Noticeboard notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is 89.200.15.69 / Eurocave. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Talk:NikkieTutorials. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:17, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello, the user in question keeps closing the discussion on a talkpage without asking a moderator to look at it and without regard to other users. It is a talkpage but the user does not use it as a talkpage. The user just keeps closing and reverting it. I have made a request to give that user a temporary cooldown block. 89.200.15.69 (talk) 17:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Reverts: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:NikkieTutorials&oldid=936069234 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:NikkieTutorials&oldid=936066422 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:NikkieTutorials&oldid=935858658 Then closing: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ANikkieTutorials&type=revision&diff=936245342&oldid=936245268 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:NikkieTutorials&oldid=936250714