User talk:89.238.143.70

May 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ed Hall (band), you may be blocked from editing. Gyrofrog (talk) 17:24, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

>> I Dont know what youre on about.

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Ed Hall (band). &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  17:25, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  17:29, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm EricEnfermero. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Iain Dale, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. EricEnfermero (Talk) 09:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Accuracy of Iain Dales character and lack of due diligence wrt facts
It should be acknowledged that iain dale has made serious error of judgement and has sought to vilify for example Ms Fields based on gossip not fact. This is a serious character flaw for a political commentator who seeks to be taken seriously.

May 2015
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Iain Dale. Thank you. EricEnfermero (Talk) 09:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

>> :why do you want to have Dales character flaws and libelous activities hidden ?


 * It's not that we want anything in particular hidden. There are really two problems I'm seeing: 1) We want facts to be supported directly by reliable sources. 2) We only want the facts, not any additional commentary or interpretation. If you're saying that a WP subject has done certain significant things, good or bad, and you have a reliable source, just say those things. Don't include any additional comments on the matter, like how it reflects on their character, honesty or qualifications. EricEnfermero (Talk) 09:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

>> Iain Dale has defamed and libeled Ms Fields whilst being part of a concerted smear campaign. Surely this should be in his profile. Why do you want to have this hidden from public view?

His profile includes interpretation by way of very selective links and commentary. Surely if its to be honest then the contrary links and commentary should also be supplied by you. Are you paid to protect his image?


 * Actually just a volunteer who is committed to a neutral encyclopedia. I'm unfamiliar with the subjects involved in this dispute. If you're seeing contentious, unsupported material on WP and you're unable to take it down, you might seek help from administrators at WP:BLPN. One inappropriate response is to add your own contentious, unsupported material in response. EricEnfermero (Talk) 18:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Mohammed Ansar and your smear campaign
>> The fact is that those named in his wikipedia page are all either pro-Zionist and or Neo Conservatives they either have claimed it on the record or it has been written about in the mainstream media, whilst Mohammed Ansar is neither of these. Why shouldnt this observation that each individual who is making allegations against Ansar (ironically these are not proven facts which you ask of me) adhere to a certain political ideology not be allowed by you, whilst you allow the incorrect slight that Ansar is an Islamist or that hesupports Islamist ideology ? 89.238.143.70 (talk) 15:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Why are you perpetrating a smear campaign ?

>>> Please provide your evidence I am a neo-conservative or pro-Zionist. Thanks, Jeremy Duns (talk) 09:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for evading a previous block. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Neil N  talk to me 02:58, 25 November 2015 (UTC)