User talk:89.238.166.15

Huh?
If you read the piece properly, it's very careful not to assert any of the allegations as fact. If merely records that the allegations have been made, and the purported evidence for them - in a similar, albeit less thorough, way to the allowed pages about the Obama 'birther' theories. All the assertions of fact are well-documented in the public record. It was my intention to add references later - this was just a first pass at the text itself, which it seemed no one had had a crack at yet. The controversy is beginning to bubble up through the MSM - it seems curious that the guardians of Wikipedia should wish to stop that being recorded. If you are aware of evidence to the contrary, perhaps you would be good enough to append that, to improve the article, rather than merely nihilistically deleting.

August 2009
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TharsHammar Bits andPieces 23:36, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.