User talk:89.240.240.72

reverting without a summary
If you revert edits without an edit summary, this implies that you are reverting vandalism. If, for some reason, you believe me to be vandalous, back up your assertion. If not, establish in the edit summary or the talk page the reason you are re-instating this material, the relevance to the article which is not established. "St Columba Church of Scotland, Glasgow," may well be "known as the Highland Cathedral" but this does not mean that it was the inspiration for this tune.

Please be aware that if you disregard the above and revert again you will have contravened the three-revert rule and could face a block from editing. Mutt Lunker (talk) 18:27, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I noticed that you made a change to an article, John Hartfield, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 10:18, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.