User talk:89.26.25.122

g'day LynxTufts

could you please inform me what about both entries (listed below) is so much non-constructive and disruptive that you need to revert it?

thanks Pierre --

User talk:pierre.madl From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia March 2018

1st attempt to embedd: Non-Thermal Effects and Mechanisms of Interaction Between Electromagnetic Fields and Living Matter http://www.icems.eu/papers.htm Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Mobile phone radiation and health appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 23:34, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

2nd tentative to embedd: EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/reveh.2016.31.issue-3/reveh-2016-0011/reveh-2016-0011.pdf Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mobile phone radiation and health. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards. If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LynxTufts (talk) 13:58, 19 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I guess the above is a message meant for you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 15:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Simply readding material that another editor has reverted for a valid reason is tendentious editing. You are welcome to discuss the topic with the original reverter Tgeorgescu, or on the talk page, but please do not simply re-introduce the contested material without discussion. LynxTufts (talk) 19:08, 19 March 2018 (UTC)