User talk:89.8.101.58

June 2022
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 00:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Response
Sir, your accusations are so ridiculous that you have lost what respect and sympathy I had for you. The contents of a publicly visible website are not private information, and I drew no conclusions about any editor's identity. I am also curious as to whose identity you accuse me of stealing?

With respectful greetings to the Kingdom of Norway, its government and its administrative authorities, Yngvadottir (talk) 00:12, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * You published the name of the director while stating the organisation page was "clearly hoax committed one man and you published a name:
 * Thus you published that persons name while claiming the site was a "hoax" thus you accused a Norwegian National of dishonesty and hoaxes and smeared thereby the honour of his name, to the best you could.
 * Then you published the name as a "hoaxer" on Wikipedia.
 * You have therefor claimed the person of has committed criminal activity and posted that on wikipedia. 89.8.101.58 (talk) 00:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * you think I am idiot?
 * I do not publish the ID you was "curious about" stealing because the act of merely posting the name
 * of another at Wikipedia is a crime.
 * So : Nice try.
 * But I am unfortunately not an idiot.
 * But perhaps you would you like to reveal your full name here? 89.8.101.58 (talk) 00:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, you are. Both my edit summary statement, The results of my search for sources suggest hoaxing, and my statement in the discussion, substantially a hoax article, referred to the Wikipedia page ("article"), not to the website. I made no speculation regarding the identity of the creator of the page beyond noting that his or her username,, suggested a "connected contributor", that is, that he/she had a conflict of interest with the topic of the page. Thank you for explaining. Yngvadottir (talk) 01:06, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * In the now-deleted article House of Nobility (Norway), the director of the House of Madness identified himself by name via the file "File:Prince G****** of R********* of The North Sea Empire T2020 Jubileum Standard Arms.jpg" (censored by me). I think you did a good job in the AfD discussion, Yngvadottir. You even took the time to check whether he is notable in his own right, and for your thoughtfulness, you receive threats and foul words. Brox Sox (talk) 02:17, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello there Brox Sox and thank you so much for your vandalism.
 * And for taking the time to dishonour the Norwegian nobility, in front of their sworn enemies.
 * The Danish nobility and Swedish nobility has wanted to kill all Norwegian nobles for thousands of years, and nearly as revenge for earlier days when the Norwegian nobility killed them instead.
 * The Danish and Swedish nearly succeeded during the 500 years Norway was the laughing stock of Scandinavia because the Norwegian warriors were to few to manage to kill the Danish and Swedish in stead. So. Denmark and Sweden will presumably pay you your 30 silver coins happily.
 * But why dont you travel to Norway and go to their clubhouse and sneak up on them.
 * Viking Identity & Christianity – The Performed Violence of Olaf Tryggvason – The Postgrad Chronicles 89.8.101.58 (talk) 17:05, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Harbard the Ferryman & the Embarrassment of Thor – On the Presence of Odin or Loki in Hárbarðsljóð – The Postgrad Chronicles 89.8.101.58 (talk) 17:12, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Maybe you should not confuse Norwegian warlords & Harry and Megan
 * Norwegian history was not exactly like American Idol, The Oscars or similar events.
 * There are reasons Norwegians nobles keep to themselves. Or flat out avoid each other.
 * File:Gjermundbu helmet - cropped.jpg - Wikipedia 89.8.101.58 (talk) 17:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Maybe have something to with this. Maybe...
 * The St. Brice’s Day Massacre: History, Archaeology, and Myth – The Postgrad Chronicles
 * "The apparent order to kill ‘all the Danish men who were in England’ is affirmed in a diploma of 7 December 1004 which renews the privileges of the monastery of St Frideswide in Oxford, necessary as the church holding their deeds had burned down during the massacre of the Danes: 89.8.101.58 (talk) 17:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I think perhaps you should not confuse Norwegian nobility with English. There seems to valid reasons for privacy concerns if you take a quick look at what traditionally went on at such meetings.
 * Just a thought.
 * Blood Eagles, Fatal Walks, and Hung Meat – Assessing Viking Torture – The Postgrad Chronicles 89.8.101.58 (talk) 17:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Well,
 * As I think people should understand that these people are less concerned with being "Collaborative and civil".
 * The St. Brice’s Day Massacre: History, Archaeology, and Myth – The Postgrad Chronicles 89.8.101.58 (talk) 17:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * :-) Have a nice summer. Brox Sox (talk) 09:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)