User talk:89sec

September 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. In particular, please observe MOS:LQ: use the "logical quotation" style in all articles. Include terminal punctuation within the quotation marks only if it was present in the original material, and otherwise place it after the closing quotation mark. Thank you. -- Red rose64 (talk) 22:59, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for removing vandalism from Rick and Morty. We appreciate this, but unfortunately your edit was not successful in restoring the article to its pre-vandalised state. For future reference, it is better to deal with vandalism by checking the article's [ page history] to determine how it appeared before it was vandalised. You can then restore the whole article, or the relevant part of it, to an appropriate earlier version. If you simply delete the visible vandalism then any content removed or overwritten by the vandal is lost. See How to deal with vandalism for details. Thank you. Chamith  (talk)  07:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

A quick tip on warning vandals
Hi, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! I noticed that you helped revert some vandalism, and then left a note on the vandal's talk page. Although that is the right thing to do, I just wanted to let you know that there are "Templates" you can use to write messages quicker. For example, typing " ~ " would leave a faster warning with your signature. There are a huge amount of templates, so I would recommend you take a look at WP:TWINKLE, as it's a great anti-vandal tool which lets you leave warnings quickly. Again, thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! ~Liancetalk/contribs 23:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * These templates should not be used directly, rather, they should be substituted. That is, use etc. - this is part of a series, see WP:WARNING. -- Red rose64 (talk) 23:08, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, re - they'd already been warned several times in the previous hour, and had, in fact, been blocked for their behaviour. If they're currently serving a block, there's no need to warn again; if not, but there are recent warnings, check their contributions to see if they have edited since the last warning - if not, don't warn them again (see WP:UW). If they have edited since the last warning, and the previous warning was recent, your new warning should be no "weaker" than the previous warning. As I mentioned yesterday, there is a scale: for the vandalism warnings, it goes  →  →  →  after which your only option is to report them to WP:AIV. -- Red rose64 (talk) 09:42, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Reverting vandalism
First, sincere thanks, 89sec, for your reverting vandalism as part of the of the recent changes patrol. Please make sure when you revert vandalism, you are reverting the entire string of bad edits. Using the Undo section for a string of of two or more consecutive edits of vandalism won't do it in one click. You will either have to manually undo each bad edit, or use an automated tool. If you aren't autoconfirmed yet, you will be soon. As soon as you are, I suggest enabling Twinkle at your Preferences under Gadgets. I see you're doing a great job combating vandalism, so in a month or so, if you keep it up, ask me on my talk page, and I'd be pleased to grant you rollback. In the meantime, the CVU Academy goes over topics every RC patroller should know. Thanks again for your help. Regards,– Gilliam (talk) 06:02, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)