User talk:8r0k3n

In response to your feedback
You don't have to.

Ariconte (talk) 02:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

&#160;
 * I ran 'reflinks' (see User:DumZiBoT/refLinks) on a couple of your articles and I must say it does a poor job of converting whatever web data was at your sources. If these people are really notable better references should be available.  See WP:42 for a hard headed explanation of desired source quality.  Regards, Ariconte (talk) 02:49, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

A Ref Tool
There is a "Cite" toolbar at the top of the edit window which allows you to automatically generate the required wiki code.



You click one of the templates, e.g. "book", and fill in the details.

More information can be found in Referencing for beginners or the citations tutorial (the below video will play best in Firefox or Chrome):

Hope this helps,. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 02:51, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, 8r0k3n


Hello, 8r0k3n, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * Introduction to Wikipedia | Tutorial
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode


 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out Questions, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! AshLin (talk) 16:56, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

{{Hidden|style=width: 50%;|contentstyle=text-align: left;|1=How do I create citations?|2=#Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for. 
 * 1) Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
 * 2) In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
 * 3) Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
 * 4) Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like, copy the whole thing).
 * 5) In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
 * 6) If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

Some tips
Since you are into stub-creation for the FLOSS movement, as I see from Alolita Sharma & its talk page, some tips.

Please ensure that your stubs are having:
 * At least 2 reliable references, preferably encased in Citation style 1 templates.
 * One or more relevant categories, besides those added by stub templates.
 * WikiProject Talk templates, see that of WikiProject Biography as that must be there on biographies.

A simple guide to simple assessment & more complicated assessment, though pertaining to WikiProject India, but you get the picture.
 * Guide (Part 1) - To learn the minimum about how to evaluate.
 * Guide (Part 2) - To learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template.

Are you aware of WikiProject Software/Free Software?

Stub template should be at the bottom, just above categories.

Level two heading for references, i.e..

AshLin (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Message sent with Global message delivery.

Speedy deletion nomination of Mike Milinkovich


A tag has been placed on Mike Milinkovich requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 08:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alolita Sharma


The article Alolita Sharma has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I really hate to do this, but, the Wikipedian in me is going insane about this. I've tried to expand the article and failed to succeed - it doesn't appear that she might meet GNG. Perhaps others will have luck.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SarahStierch (talk) 17:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Mike Milinkovich for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Milinkovich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mike Milinkovich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. asilvering (talk) 03:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)