User talk:90.195.160.226

August 2023
Hello, I'm DefenderTienMinh07. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Christopher Snowdon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ☀DefenderTienMinh⛤☯☽ ( talk ) 10:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I removed some edits made in July 2023 for the reasons already described. 'The Fat Lie' report does not seem to be "notable" (it has one citation) and there is no reason to include criticism of it from two people (one of whom is not credible) unless the entry is to be expanded to include all criticism and praise of his other works. The description of the IEA is clearly not neutral - it is a free market think tank and is described as such by, for example, the BBC. I can find no evidence that the IEA is currently funded by BP or BAT. Even if it were, it is undue weight to focus on these funders. I can also find no indication of what Snowden's degree grade was - the source cited does not say. 90.195.160.226 (talk) 08:52, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christopher Snowdon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. EmilySarah99 (talk) 09:25, 18 August 2023 (UTC)


 * They are not vandalism. The page has been vandalised by another user and I have restored NPOV. Reasons are given above. Please explain why you wish to maintain edits that are not neutral, give undue weight and are unsourced. 90.195.160.226 (talk) 09:49, 18 August 2023 (UTC)