User talk:90.216.218.209

As I said, irrelevant what the major sanctioning bodies define as a unified champion, unified is not undisputed, so that part of the sentence and accompanied citations are pointless. As for it not being "official"...the International Boxing Hall of Fame recognised Claressa Shields as the undisputed middleweight champion on their most recent meeting's guest list (because she holds all of the titles from major sanctioning bodies), BoxRec recognises Usyk as the first undisputed four belt cruiserweight champion. David Haye, who held the WBA, WBC and WBO in 2008, was never considered an undisputed champion...because he did not hold the IBF in this current "big four" era (by 2007, all four organisations recognised each other). Meaning an undisputed champion must hold all the major belts in that particular era, hence why Lennox Lewis is noted as the last undisputed heavyweight champion with only the WBA, WBC and IBF because this was pre 2007 and all the "Big four" did not yet recognise each other. Wladimir Klitschko and most recently Anthony Joshua and Andy Ruiz are not noted as undisputed champions, because they did not hold all four of the major sanctioning world titles. Cecilia Braekhus holds a Guinness World Record for being the longest reigning four belt undisputed champion. Before this, Wladimir Klitschko did not hold the record for being the longest reigning three belt undisputed champion...because post 2007, there is no such thing. An undisputed champion can only be considered as such if the fighter holds ALL FOUR of the belts from the major sanctioning bodies.

If the definition of undisputed champion is in question, then surely half of this page and the "list of undisputed champions" page need deleting, and every boxer that is credited with being a four belt undisputed champion on Wikipedia should have such things removed?