User talk:90.235.125.241

October 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Naphthalene—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:52, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * I just made the links clearer. I do not understand why the link absolutely must go via the redirection Naphthene instead of directly to Cycloalkane. 90.235.125.241 (talk) 15:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The Distinguish hatnote is exactly and explicitly to resolve linguistic or typographic confusion. Nobody would ever type the word "naphthalene" and say "oops, I actually meant to type "cycloalkane". If someone hears the word "naphthene" and winds up guessing or autocompleting to "naphthalene", they wouldn't know that "cycloalkane" is even the place they should really be clicking. One of the whole reasons redirects exist is to support synonyms for article-names. DMacks (talk) 16:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, redirects are good when one search, but there is no point in a page linking to a redirect. 90.235.125.241 (talk) 17:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Apparently you disagree philosophically with how I read the hatnote's stated intent. Please join Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking. DMacks (talk) 18:27, 3 October 2020 (UTC)