User talk:90.243.120.95

February 2024
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Reversed Ze, you may be blocked from editing. Non-notable conlanguages are not relevant for including in an article. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 15:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Small capital B, you may be blocked from editing. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Yes but will u answer the questions I asked in the appeal? 90.243.120.95 (talk) 17:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * It would help if you read through the essays previously suggested to you about original research, notability, reliable sourcese, etc. and demonstrated an interest in following the community rules and expectations, including not trying to evade previously applied blocks. Regarding "Cyrilika," it's in the "constructed scripts and languages" section of Omniglot and would be effectively user generated content. "Zeshmiteng" appears only in an alphabet song YouTube video; there's no indication of notability. As has previously been explained to you, "in my opinion" does not meet the standards of evidence required for changes to a Wikipedia article. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 19:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * What about ur edits to Sekai’s Blog? This was a draft I made during my very early days of editing Wikipedia. And I didn’t think u would tamper with it. 90.243.120.95 (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Also the Hebrew Gimel appears twice in the article about yogh. And also in a part of the case in the article about the ampersand mathematical symbols like ⅋ are not letters bc they have no linguistic usage and it had no cases. 90.243.120.95 (talk) 19:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Seeing your contributions, it looks like you have seen my reply so why don’t u respond? 90.243.120.95 (talk) 19:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I didn't make them, but the reversion to your draft article were likely because you were trying to evade a block. Your edits to yogh and ampersand were more extensive than you're mentioning here. I've removed the second gimel from the article (thank you for pointing that out); the turned ampersand is not a letter, but the glyph is a descendent of &, which makes it appropriate to mention. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 19:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Just because I was using this I.P to evade my block doesn’t mean all my edits are disruptive. 90.243.120.95 (talk) 19:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Will u respond? 90.243.120.95 (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * This is going to be my last response. To put it simply, trying to evade a block is disruptive behavior and goes against community standards. Spend some time reading the suggested policies, guidelines, and essays. If you continue to think your edits and block-evasion aren't disruptive, then you aren't ready to contribute to the project. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 20:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I was just polishing that draft and changing things that didn’t seem to be in the manual of style. 90.243.120.95 (talk) 20:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Will u respond? 90.243.120.95 (talk) 20:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Courtesy ping @. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)