User talk:90.246.204.35

May 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Patrick O'Donnell (Invincible), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Leventio (talk) 08:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Patrick O'Donnell (Invincible). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Leventio (talk) 08:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Moved from User talk:Leventio
Sir, I refer to your concerns regrads my edits of some of the text within 'Patrick O'Donnell'

Whilst I understand we are in the midst of an abandonment of all rules or regard for the English language I respectfully suggest that the syntax of the text I tried to correct stated that murder took place in the Old Bailey, and not the trial for murder. There are other such errors in syntax on the page I did not bother correcting.

Exactly how bad does the written word have to be before you alter it or stop it? it seems the limit is not when the meaning is utterly changed.

Don't reply, I am changing my IP now so instead of just one or two simple and fair corrections I shall now be visiting you more often.

I might add that whilst you can remove the edits that using my IP to send me messages is all a bit grubby.... old chap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.246.204.35 (talk) 13:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay first off, if your going to lament about the abandonment of "all rules or regard for the English language," I'd first suggest that the edit you tried to add, and the message you write to me not be so full of such disregard for said language.


 * And secondly, the reason why I keep reverting your addition is because your adding it in the citation template (specifically where the title of said source is place... which by the way was already correct and had no parenthetical part in said title close to resembling your content), and you aren't actually adding it in the actually body of the article. The problem isn't content, or syntax (well... not that there wasn't some), rather the problem is where your placing your content.


 * Also, not sure what your going on about in the last prose, but these are all "standardised user warnings templates we give both disruptive IPs and users. If you want to critique its grubbyness, bring it up with the group that helps create these templates. Have a nice day. Leventio (talk) 18:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC)