User talk:90.254.190.141

September 2021
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – DarkGlow • 10:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, John Rhys-Davies, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lavender &#124;(formerly HMSSolent )&#124; lambast 06:30, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Carnosaur 3: Primal Species. AJFU (talk) 17:27, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 20:16, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Carnosaur (film). AJFU (talk) 15:14, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Elemimele. Please could you stop changing Actor to Actress at Elisabeth Moss. There is evidence in that article that they prefer to be called an actor, which is a gender-neutral term applied to both men and women. We should respect this sort of preference. You are also edit-warring, by reverting reversions, and if you continue to do it, may get you blocked. You were probably unaware that I was trying to correct this. Elemimele (talk) 20:17, 2 October 2021 (UTC) I'm striking the above, because looking more closely, I can't see that you're necessarily wrong! Sorry! Elemimele (talk) 20:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Your recent editing history at Elisabeth Moss shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 09:16, 3 October 2021 (UTC)