User talk:90.43.64.157

June 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Oregano, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Zefr (talk) 20:03, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello,

The sources given on the page ([10][15])says that oregano have clinical evidences proving it's effect on human health (again demonstrated antifungal activity,anti bacterial...) but that wasn't the case on the Wikipedia page "there is no clinical evidence to indicate that either has any effect on human health" is de facto an incomplete affirmation.

My intention wasn't to change the content but to add a explanation.

Have a nice day.
 * In editing for an encyclopedia, we have to be certain of the source quality. The Wikipedia guide for sourcing on medical/clinical topics is WP:MEDRS, summarized by this tutorial. The source you wanted doesn't meet this standard. --Zefr (talk) 15:49, 15 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Ok but if the source doesn't meet this standard why is it cited on the page in the first place ?
 * It's assumed an editor has some understanding of the literature used for the source, WP:CIR; it has to be kept in perspective of what's traditional medicine, what's basic pharmacology, and what's strong clinical evidence. --Zefr (talk) 16:13, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

That why I didn't make a correction or delete the original content and why I wanted to add a note,people shouldn't think that oregano is a useless dietetary supplement (as implied by the original content),Oregano and it's oil have a pharmacological activity in vitro and in vivo (this can be seen on the wikipedia pages for Carvacrol or Thymol,, , , or on the other sources cited before. It's not traditionnal medcine based on beliefs and it should be seen on the English Wikipedia page.
 * These sources are preliminary lab research and may not be reproducible; WP:MEDANIMAL. They are not encyclopedic sources. Read through WP:MEDRS for further details. --Zefr (talk) 04:05, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

− Hello,I understand your point but,and I know that I seem determined, why Carvacrol and Thymol Wikipedia pages have a whole section on theirs biologicals properties ? There is a contradiction between these articles also some studies on the Carvacrol pages shouldn't be seen as encyclopedic resources since some are preliminary lab research and again I'm not saying that oregano have effects on human health,I say that it's oil have a pharmacologically active profile this is not seen on the page and only on the English page.

Thank you for your time and have a nice day.