User talk:90254hgs1991

April 2018
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 331dot (talk) 09:50, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

The proposed new username is acceptable. However, the other elements of the block still need to be addressed. To be unblocked: If you have no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organization, then you will not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend you consider alternative outlets.
 * you must confirm that this account is used by one individual only
 * you must agree to avoid creating or directly editing articles related to your organization (requested edits will still be permitted)
 * you must agree to abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use and disclose any paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy
 * you must indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future

So we know understanding is mutual, please state your understanding/response to each item in your own words.

I'm sorry that this message could not be more favorable. 331dot (talk) 17:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

I would add that I will not be reviewing the block, but you do need to address those points. Thanks 331dot (talk) 17:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)


 * I've globally renamed User:CVSindycar to User:90254hgs1991, and someone else will review your unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * What do you think?--Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 20:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I would just ask them to more clearly state or clarify their COI, which I assume they have since they have agreed to not directly edit the page. If they clarify that point, I trust your judgement on this matter, Dlohcierekim. 331dot (talk) 21:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Note that internship positions are explicitly covered in the paid editing policy and must abide by the same disclosure requirements as paid employees ("Interns are considered employees for this purpose. If they are directed or expected to edit Wikipedia as part of an internship, they must disclose").-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:08, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Dale Coyne Racing with Vasser Sullivan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dale Coyne Racing with Vasser Sullivan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dale Coyne Racing with Vasser Sullivan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 20:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)