User talk:91.10.4.162

Welcome!
Yeah sorry, but I can't take this seriously, coming from you. Maybe you should get your mixed messaging in order. - 91.10.4.162 (talk) 02:23, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, well tell us what it is you are having such a hard time understanding and we'll try and help you. We're nice like that. - the WOLF  child  02:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Why do you think I have a hard time understanding anything?
 * Tell you what, get me a decent and civil discussion with BilCat about the articles' issues. Then you will see how productive I can be when I'm not prevented from it. - 91.10.4.162 (talk) 02:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It is not my responsibility to arrange discussions for you with other editors. If you can't do that on your own, then you need to re-evaluate your ability to contribute to this project. - the WOLF  child  11:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Please don't template me. - 91.10.4.162 (talk) 02:21, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Please stop your disruptive editing and I won't need to. - the WOLF  child  02:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I noticed that you did not even notified BilCat, much less templated him. Are you sure you are unbiased?
 * Just tell me if you see that I did something wrong. Templates are rude. - 91.10.4.162 (talk) 02:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I did "tell you that you did something wrong"... with the templates I posted here. (I'm required to post them if I want to report you later to have you blocked). Perhaps if you had actually read those messages instead immediately deleting them, you wouldn't be struggling now. Bil did nothing wrong, what would I warn him about? If you want a discussion with Bil, stop your disruptive editing and edit-warring. Go to the article talk page, post your question, ping Bil and you should have your discussion. Not that difficult... - the WOLF  child  02:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Bil did nothing wrong? So who did all the edit-warring? - 91.10.4.162 (talk) 02:50, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * You. - the WOLF  child  03:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * All by myself?
 * Please check your bias. - 91.10.4.162 (talk) 03:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Please check your facts. And your attitude. - the WOLF  child  11:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Don't deflect, your bias is obvious. - 91.10.2.111 (talk) 12:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * See my comment below. - the WOLF  child  13:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Bookmark
Personal attacks from user Thewolfchild
 * Um, hate to break it to ya, but that comment was about a different user. Nothing to do with you, unless you are using that account as well. Are you admitting to using using multiple accounts? - the WOLF  child  03:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, right. Bilcat talks to you about "some know-it-all IP" making exactly the edit I made here, you mention "this little twerp IP" in your replay, but it's not about me. Sure.
 * You should really try to develop some civility when dealing with other editors.
 * Also I'm an IP, I don't use any accounts. - 91.10.2.111 (talk) 05:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * That is some great detective work there, 'Sherlock', but if you look a little deeper, you'll see that Bil and I were indeed referring to another IP user, who's disruptive editing stopped almost exactly when your disruptive editing began (same page even, imagine the odds...). They posted no complaints and our comments about them have since been removed, so that matter is basically closed (unless you feel an urge to keep harping on about it). But I think your time would be better spent learning the policies & guidelines here. Your inexperience and combative behaviour thus far is quite evident. You have only made 40 edits in total, and only 11 of those edits are to articles, and yet you've still managed to get into edit wars with 3 different editors on 3 different pages. It would appear that you are not here to help build this project. If you choose to continue, know that competency is required. So read, learn, and try to contribute more effectively. - the WOLF  child  11:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Please point out the legendary IP you are referring to.
 * I'm sorry that I can't contribute to the project with my full attention while I have to defend against your harassment. I suggest you find your good faith, stop the personal attacks and let me do my work. - 91.10.2.111 (talk) 12:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Nope, further below. - the WOLF  child  13:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

templates
"I asked you to stop templating" - and I told you that if you could follow the policies & guidelines here, I wouldn't need to. You failed to provide an explanation for your edit, therefore it was rightfully reverted. Your demand that I "read the bloody article to find the explanation" was both rude and juvenile. The way you're going, someone is going to post a complaint about you and request that you be blocked. All of this evidence that you are so handily providing in support of that block will make it a very easy decision for any admin to make. I will strongly urge you to stop your disruptive editing now. Perhaps take the rest of the day off and try again tomorrow? In the meantime, read thru the welcome template I posted above, learn how things work here and hopefully you can stay out of trouble and become a more effective contributor. - the WOLF  child  03:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * So we have one editor making personal attacks against another, but the target of the attacks should stop being disruptive? - 91.10.2.111 (talk) 05:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * No, the "target" of the template notices clearly deserved them because their editing violated the policies & guidelines of this project. These notices are not punitive, they're informative. They are meant to instruct editors, especially inexperienced ones such as yourself, when they have made edits that were not beneficial or inline with our policies, and perhaps even disruptive. No one is "attacking" you. Stop taking things so personally, realize that not everything is about you, and try to learn how things work here so that you can contribute more effectively. - the WOLF  child  11:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * "Don't deflect, your bias is obvious". (91.10.2.111 (talk) 12:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC))
 * "I'm sorry that I can't contribute to the project with my full attention while I have to defend against your harassment. I suggest you find your good faith, stop the personal attacks and let me do my work". (91.10.2.111 (talk) 12:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC))
 * Stop talking about myself, and start thinking how you can be constructive. So far, you do a lousy job. - 91.10.2.111 (talk) 12:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Your "work" is summed up here; like I said, a grand total of 11 edits that lead to 3 different edit wars, with 3 different editors and disrupted 3 different articles (that is what I would call beyond "lousy"). Add to that your now 32 edits of talk-page nonsense, and you entire contribution to this project is net-negative. You haven't contributed one iota of worthwhile content or made one single improvement. You are the last, absolute last, person who should be criticizing anyone's performance here. Now, you can either prove me wrong, and go make some worthwhile edits that either help build, or help maintain this project, or... you can just keep commenting here, with post after post of 'must-have-last-word' pagefill. Up to you... - the WOLF  child  13:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)