User talk:91.127.73.122

May 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 14:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * Convert to an article-space partial block to see if that happens? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:15, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with whatever you decide, . And I don't care if you simply unblock them, maybe with a 1R condition or something like that. I was wondering if this (and the other) IP was perhaps also this editor, because there are some similarities in tone, but they're actually taking the opposite tack on Stoll. They will need to be careful since this is a BLP and we can't have mudslinging (I'm not saying they did that!). I'm particularly interested in the Beverley article from this edit. A good way forward for them would be to propose an edit change involving that article on the talk page, and asking those who reverted to discuss. If they can't explain why they reverted, or what's wrong with that article, then the IP should be free to insert it. Does this make sense? I guess I'm sort of advocating for yes, only a partial block, at the most, and access to the article talk page (s). Mind you, I'm saying this because they (finally) engaged in positive conversation on a talk page. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 21:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Face-smile.svg ✅ ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:29, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * (WP:DISCFAIL may help) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:29, 16 May 2021 (UTC)