User talk:91.144.106.222

Qatar Air Force
Please don’t add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source, as you have done on the Qatar Air Force article. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources –Thank you FOX 52 (talk) 19:50, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Azerbaijani Air and Air Defence Force. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for unsourced inflation of numbers. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 19:08, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Qatar Air Force. New numbers require a new source... - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 19:09, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hungarian Air Force, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Light and Dark2000  🌀 (talk) 15:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Hungarian Air Force. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. MilborneOne (talk) 13:59, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Hungarian Air Force
Please don’t add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source, as you have done on the Hungarian Air Force article. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources –Thank you FOX 52 (talk) 15:10, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 16:57, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unsourced changes
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for long term addition of unsourced content to multiple articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Per a complaint at WP:RFPP about disruptive editing of Hungarian Air Force. EdJohnston (talk) 19:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Islamic Republic of Iran Navy, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 19:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Continued addition of unsourced content
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)