User talk:91.148.176.219

May 2021
Hello, I'm Yamla. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Apple A14, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 09:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Apple A14, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 21:43, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. --Yamla (talk) 22:15, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sonic Colors, you may be blocked from editing. You have been told that non-notable game engines without an article don't belong in infoboxes and yet you continue adding them. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

June 2022
Hello, I'm Pulpfiction621. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Shredder's Revenge have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Pulpfiction621 (talk) 14:48, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

 * Hello! There is nothing disruptive. A16 officially is 4nm. Yes 4nm can be in 5nm family, but it's 4nm. Please, let it be 4nm 91.148.176.219 (talk) 14:44, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Dear user, the manufacturer (TSMC) does not have any 4nm fabrication process, as it has been proven by official sources. Their next manufacturing process (3nm) is still not ramping up. A16 is fabbed on their enhanced N5 technology - N4, which is different from "4 nm" ("N" <> "nm"). Wikipedia articles are written based on scientific information, and not industry propaganda. This explanation can be found in the articles. R adi X  ∞  14:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello! Watch the Apple presconferation. Also it's dubbed 4nm in many places just like the Samsung process and the Qualcomm. 91.148.176.219 (talk) 15:06, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, you are right about the Apple event! They really mentioned that the A16 is the first "4nm" chip in a smartphone. However, this was inaccurate/misleading information or industry propaganda, acceptable for commercial purposes (would the public understand if they said "N4 process technology"? I don't think so...)... The next TSMC node stride from 5nm process is 3nm. R adi X  ∞  15:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 4nm is still a think tho. It's not "inacurate" since the other manufacturers have it. When you think about there has to be something inbetween 5 and 3... thats 4 :)
 * Also M2 is not variant of A16. It's variant of A15. M1 is based on A14 cores, M2 is the cores of A15 - Avalanche and Blizzard. You have to fix this. 91.148.176.219 (talk) 15:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey, the same goes for Intel: Raptor Lake. "Intel 7" is not necessarily a 7nm manufacturing process. All Wikipedia articles have been structured this way since then. I'm also an Apple user and I appreciate all their achievements. However, we need to prioritize scientific sources and follow patterns established by Wikipedia community. Anyway, both information (tech name and nanometer info) is included in the article. R adi X  ∞  16:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * You're right about M2. The internal link to Apple M2 has been mistakenly imported from a previous template. Fixed. Thanks! R adi X  ∞  16:14, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * No problem! :)
 * Btw here directly from TSMC:
 * https://www.tsmc.com/english/dedicatedFoundry/technology/logic/l_5nm
 * "In addition, TSMC plans to launch 4nm (N4) technology, an enhanced version of N5 technology. N4 provides further enhancement in performance, power and density for the next wave of N5 products."
 * So it's 4nm :) People mistakes it, because it's made in same 5nm factory. 91.148.176.219 (talk) 16:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Btw from where is your source of 2.01 GHz small cores? Nowhere is mentioned from what I know. You put source for the big cores, but no source for the frequency of the small cores. Imo they are also +200MHz over the old. 91.148.176.219 (talk) 16:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello! I have added the 4nm thing in both templates, so now I hope the information is more accurate, although is a commercial name. Please have a look at 5 nm process - all have the same dimensions (Transistor gate pitch), the reason why it is commonly referred to as a enhanced version of N5 tech, and not a new node. I think the frequency of the efficiency cores was also copied from the old/base article. Removed. Thanks again. R adi X  ∞  16:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Actually the "Display engine" is not new. It exists in past A chips aswell. It seems it's just modified/improved to support those features.
 * Sources / Diagrams:
 * https://miro.medium.com/max/700/0*obsWRpXqi_MYNyyG.jpg
 * https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/wSV2EZ6ZhJF4rzjXcYe9Zf.png 91.148.176.219 (talk) 10:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Registered user
Hey, there are plenty of benefits to registering an account. Why not? ;) R adi X  ∞  01:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hey! I think I have one actually. I have to look for my data tho! :) Thank you! 91.148.176.219 (talk) 08:49, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Here we go! :) BorisDG (talk) 08:50, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Thank you for contributing to the article Apple A16. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. See also WP:TWITTER, tweets are only reliable when talking about the user themselves (for example, a verified celebrity account tweeting opinions or information about themselves), not for information about something or someone else. I've also undone a number of your other contributions which were unsourced, but as your source appears to be Twitter, those would have been invalid anyways. —Locke Cole • t • c 19:45, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm Hajoon0102. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to iPhone 14 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Hajoon0102 💬 03:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The specs like I said are copy pasted from the 14 Pro template to the 14 .... so many mistakes. Was listed that 14 / Plus has A16 ... that it uses same 120Hz 2000nits screen... which is not true. Please CORRECT!!! 91.148.176.219 (talk) 15:26, 17 January 2023 (UTC)