User talk:91.154.106.199

December 2011
Hello and welcome! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content without explaining why. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing, and, if you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you!  Puffin  Let's talk! 19:49, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Paloma Faith shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. De728631 (talk) 20:00, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The singles are also notable and should at least appear in a simple list in the artists main article. That is common practice and you should discuss any changes to that on the article's talk page. Do not revert any more on that article today or you will be reported for edit-warring. De728631 (talk) 20:06, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * See Talk:Paloma Faith. Let's continue the discussion over there where it belongs, not in the user talk. De728631 (talk) 20:12, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Please stop responding on my user talk page. The discussion takes place at the article talk page where anyone can see it. De728631 (talk) 20:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Since you keep removing the list although you have been warned of the three-reverts rule I have now reported you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. It is you who wants the article changed and so you will have to wait for consensus in the discussion until you can make your proposed changes. De728631 (talk) 21:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at Paloma Faith. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Nick-D (talk) 10:05, 6 December 2011 (UTC)