User talk:91.154.56.249

Hi. I'm not new here. I would prefer it if people were to NOT undo my perfectly fine edits without so much as even leaving me a message. I do not wish to monitor Special:MyContributions for random rollbacks. Thank you. --91.154.56.249 (talk) 13:12, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page McMahon Line did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * The Teahouse, our help forum for new users

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, visit the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Warlord Era, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Dear Vif12vf/Tiberius, if you had bothered to read my edit comments, I did not add anything, I restored a sentence that had been in the article previously. It was removed by someone absent-mindedly editing the article and nobody (including you, apparently) had actually read the section in the question.


 * When I see something wrong in an article, something that does not make sense, I go through the article's history to see where it got introduced, and to see if there is anything to salvage. If there is, I salvage what I can. This is not my content. This is someone else's content. I made no claims on the veracity of the sentence I restored. I don't care what the sentence reads, all I see is an article with a broken two-word sentence fragment. And I tried to fix it.


 * Please do not revert the article to a broken state. That is all. --91.154.56.249 (talk) 09:59, 15 June 2020 (UTC)