User talk:91.194.221.231

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to British Caledonian in the 1970s has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to British Caledonian in the 1970s constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 18:28, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. C.U.T.K.D T 08:30, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

I see that you have been warned about making edits without discussion before. Stop now or I will block you. Ground Zero | t

This edit violates WP:MOS. Do it again and I will block you from editing. Ground Zero | t 17:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Here and here are two more reversions you have done -- without any explanation -- of changes that I made that are (a) consistent with Wikipedia style and policies, and (b) that I have explained on the article's talk page. It is clear that you are not willing to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. Ground Zero | t 17:37, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Who the hell are you man to block anyone from editing Wikipedia? Just for your kind information, this is a shared PC at Crawley Library in West Sussex, England. Hence, as you will surely appreciate this is a shared, publicly accessible PC. As we're very close to Gatwick Airport, there will be plenty of people with an interest in aviation who may use the library's network of 52 PCs (which all have the same IP address) at any one time. Some of these users may from time to time edit some of these articles if they feel that the contents is not right and can prove it through relevant citations. So, let this be a warning to you: if you block access to Wikipedia for our library users, I'm going to report you to Wikipedia as well as to the library's and West Sussex County Council (the local authority employer of the library staff) for blocking our users legitimate access to an important source of information.


 * I am an administrator. Administrators are given the ability and the authority to block users under certain circumstances following the Blocking policy. Blocking is not something that I do casually, but only if repeated warning are ignored. I have explained above why your behaviour is not appropriate, and when you continued it, I warned you of a possible blocking.


 * Blocking does not prevent users from reading Wikipedia, and it does not prevent users who log in from editing Wikipedia. It only prevents users who do not log in from editing for a period of time.


 * Thank you for advising me that the IP belongs to a library. In this case, I would not block the IP because I do not wish to prevent other users from editing if it can be avoided. In this case, it would make more sense to protect the article to prevent unregistered and newly-registered users from editing. This not a desirable action either, and so I would not undertake that likely. Article protection prevents others users who may not wish to register from editing for a period of time. In the case of the articles you have been editing, there are relatively few editors, so it would have little impact on other editors. --Unsigned comment by User talk:91.194.221.231


 * You may object to an administrator's actions through the dispute resolution process. See WP:ADMIN.


 * As far as the West Sussex County Council is concerned, I am sure that they have full authority over the West Sussex Library and its staff, but I doubt that they would have much interest in your dispute with a Wikipedia administrator. You would be better off going through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process. Ground Zero | t 02:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BritishWatcher (talk) 17:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

June 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Tommy [ message ] 16:24, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. Jusdafax  16:27, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dan-Air, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dan-Air was changed by 91.194.221.231 (u) (t) deleting 8851 characters on 2010-08-17T12:48:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.  The Mi ke  •Wassup doc?  10:55, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jimmy Carr, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Majorca. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at AnnaLynne McCord, you may be blocked from editing. GcSwRhIc (talk) 16:40, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Will.i.am, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 12:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, although if you wish to acquire additional privileges, simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages, and customize the appearance and behavior of the website
 * Rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed
 * Utililize a vast array of editing tools

In addition, your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on [ my talk page]. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;). Happy editing! Ryan Vesey (talk) 18:40, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Skyways Limited with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tyrol5  [Talk]  16:10, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gatwick Airport, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Chrisieboy (talk) 18:57, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2012
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dan-Air, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Jetstreamer (talk) 23:08, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dan-Air, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Jetstreamer (talk) 21:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Dan-Air, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jetstreamer Talk 19:25, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Matt Fiddes, you may be blocked from editing. Scopecreep (talk) 13:21, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at British Caledonian in the 1980s, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Scopecreep (talk) 13:28, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.



July 2012
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to British European Airways does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! 17:52, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:08, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome!
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Daniel Case (talk) 15:39, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, I'm Biker Biker. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Peter Arne, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Biker Biker (talk) 15:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=556613001 your edit] to Gatwick Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 6 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=561072593 your edit] to Gatwick Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567805564 your edit] to British Midland International may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:42, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * – Memorandum by British Midland Airways Ltd |date=1998 |page= |publisher=www.parliament.co.uk ( Parliamentary business  MPs, Lords & offices) |accessdate=13 June 2013}}  {{cite web |url=http://www.flightglobal.
 * the type. That year, British Midland also became the first to operate the {{red|&#91;}} [British Aerospace ATP|[British Aerospace (BAe) ATP]] for which it had been the [[British Aerospace

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=571642029 your edit] to Gatwick Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:32, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Please do not make unnecessary and poorly written edits, as you did with the Gatwick Airport article. If you continue to make unconstructive contributions, you will be banned from editing. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 18:43, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=591284040 your edit] to Gatwick Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 6 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:07, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello. Could you explain why you've reverted my edits to Gatwick Airport without any explanation twice. I have been updating figures, replacing references with online ones and generally working on improving the layout of the article. If you have a problem with any of these individual edits, could you please revert them individually or discuss it on the article's talk page. Please don't just revert all edits in bulk. Cloudbound (talk) 18:22, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=621064187 your edit] to Gatwick Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:22, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=624668778 your edit] to Gatwick Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:32, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=625929171 your edit] to Gatwick Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:42, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=632957614 your edit] to Gatwick Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:34, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm Winner 42. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Gatwick Airport with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me!  18:47, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at British Caledonian in the 1970s. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively by others, please do not submit them. Wikipedia is supposed to be a collaborative effort. Thank you. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:43, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=665755903 your edit] to British Caledonian may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:33, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to British United Airways
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, British United Airways, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! JoeSperrazza (talk) 16:35, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

April 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Dangerous (Michael Jackson album), you may be blocked from editing.  Rob van  vee  14:50, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2018
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Warden Park School. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:22, 18 April 2018 (UTC)