User talk:91.244.229.44

March 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ketchup was changed by 91.244.229.44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892787 on 2013-03-26T14:29:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:29, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ketchup with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ketchup, you may be blocked from editing. Dawnseeker2000  14:58, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to James Brindley, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 09:39, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to James Brindley has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: James Brindley was changed by 91.244.229.44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2013-05-07T13:01:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fannie Lou Hamer, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 11:41, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fannie Lou Hamer with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 11:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Fannie Lou Hamer with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 11:46, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Leeds United L.F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 15:02, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2013
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Graham 87 15:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Afon Seiont has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Afon Seiont was changed by 91.244.229.44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.971488 on 2013-09-16T11:32:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:32, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Afon Seiont, you may be blocked from editing. Pieism (talk) 11:35, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Christian Benteke has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Christian Benteke was changed by 91.244.229.44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956358 on 2013-10-25T08:33:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:33, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Karl-Otto Koch has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Karl-Otto Koch was changed by 91.244.229.44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875327 on 2013-12-11T12:28:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:28, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aimee (January 16)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! (t)  Josve05a  (c)  14:53, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to John Steinbeck constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 10:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to John Steinbeck has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: John Steinbeck was changed by 91.244.229.44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.973237 on 2014-02-26T10:07:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:07, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Steinbeck. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Materialscientist (talk) 10:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to New Deal, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Donner60 (talk) 10:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ketchup has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ketchup was changed by 91.244.229.44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917013 on 2014-06-17T10:10:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ketchup. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Materialscientist (talk) 10:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ketchup. —S MALL JIM   10:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —S MALL JIM   10:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aimee concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aimee, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aimee


Hello 91.244.229.44. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Aimee".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:09, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

February 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Canon Lee School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Babita arora  10:48, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Non-renewable resource, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Non-renewable resource was changed by 91.244.229.44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.971776 on 2015-02-06T10:35:48+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:35, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Babita arora  10:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. w L &lt;speak&middot;check&gt; 12:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2015
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Samba because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 11:19, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thomas Gore Browne has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Thomas Gore Browne was changed by 91.244.229.44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.982819 on 2015-11-09T10:53:14+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas Gore Browne. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 11:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas Gore Browne, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 11:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Art Deco. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Art Deco was changed by 91.244.229.44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.980357 on 2015-11-10T11:26:33+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:26, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm Simranpreet singh. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sikhism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Simranpreet singh (talk) 11:47, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Agard. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:25, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Agard was changed by 91.244.229.44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88588 on 2018-02-06T15:25:31+00:00.