User talk:91.74.81.122

May 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Flynas, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 18:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Disagree! The Airbus O&D file (issued monthly) is the only reliable source for airlines operating an all Airbus fleet like Flynas. In the March edition it stated that Flynas had 21 A320ceo + 13 A320neo in fleet and 77 A320neo + 10 A321neo on order (Flynas could have aircraft order to a lessor, so that the total order is more than the record in the O&D file). I didn't make a user name, coz I am interested only in certain articles.

Hello, I'm BilCat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Airbus A220 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 05:27, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Airbus A220. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 05:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:51, 31 May 2021 (UTC)