User talk:91.93.48.190

February 2021
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 04:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 04:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 04:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Jingiby (talk) 06:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jingiby (talk) 04:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Battle of Kardzhali, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 23:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Kilkis-Lachanas, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 23:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Battle of Knjaževac, you may be blocked from editing. Jusdafax (talk) 23:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Baku. Jusdafax (talk) 00:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 8 March 2021 (UTC)