User talk:911allo

May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Viriditas (talk) 13:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Viriditas (talk) 13:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

I say this is major leage bullshit

There are no pyramid on Jerusalems' Supreme Court building
Viriditas needs glasses!

Viriditas will erase this and call me a terrorist ?

So you don't see a pyramid within the building of the Supreme Court of Israel in Jerusalem's picture ? I see one, I guess that I am hallucinating! This picture was accepted by wikipedia (must have been an hell of a fight just to get it accepted).

You thus pretend this picture, accepted by wikipedia, is not a reliable source ? So you say that Wikipedia is not a reliable source ?

My explanation is much simpler: wikipedia doesw not want the public to see the OBVIOUS eyed pyramid on a Supreme Court of Jerusalem paid by Rothschilds while the same Rothschild control the Federal Reserve who print the US $1 which as the same symbol (eyed pyramid) with "New World Order" written on it.

That show of power with public pyramids is followed by a Zionist media control to hide it from view. Zionist media control is very well documented too by will be denied by Wikipedia again.

As far as I can see Zionist revisionism here is quite spectacular, the level of information goes down, the ergonomy and usability are almost a fraud and I bet my car against $1 that you have tools not available to the newcommers.

In a few months Zionist my state that is earth is flat with a slight increase in your lies here.

Thanks for proving that Wikipedia is being censured and controlled by Zionists.

Viriditas : a nick to hide a liar.

August 2008
Please provide reliable sources for the material you keep adding to Supreme Court of Israel. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 13:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I notice that you did not provide sources when asked, and instead, you inserted the same personal opinion, (Note the built in blue glass pyramid on the above pictures) into the article again. It will be removed if you cannot provide sources.  Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 13:58, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Viriditas (talk) 15:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Is there a pyramid on these pictures ???
Wikipedia accepted the picture of the Supreme Court of Israel presumably as being verified before posting it.

According to Veriditas that statement is not from a verifiable source! Thus Veriditas doest not trust his own eyes or really needs glasses.

Adding a note to the reader about the presence of that pyramid was reverted by Veriditas many times.

I call this Zionist revisionism. (911allo (talk) 16:46, 1 October 2008 (UTC)).

Again it is major BULLSHIT

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am mad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic.

We here at Wikipedia are definitly concerned about you adopting a STRICT point of view about OUR reality. We will call Rothschild and MOSSAD shall you ever try to SPEAK.

If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Viriditas (talk) 15:16, 3 September 2008 (UTC) --911allo (talk) 09:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC) I consider Viriditas to lie about his political position: for me he is clearly a Zionist who will pretend he does not need glasses but can't see a pyramid that any non-Zionist human will find obvious on this picture.

There is an obvious reason he does not even talk about the image and the presence of a pyramid. Zionists cant not assume their own show of power and he is just the last defense line for this lie.

Now is Wikipedia fully Zionist or is there some truth left ?& THAT IS THE QUESTION, the rest is bullshit.

Powerfull Zionist can't assume their own show of power ? The pyramid does not exist, it was created by some hallucination ?

I am truly disgusted by your technocratic way of doing politically correct lies. I consider a lie more insulting then a direct insult. I try denounce liars with truth they will find insulting because truth alone insults a liar.

Your attitude toward truth information of high quality shows you just hide to control this media with a Zionist agenda. Zionist media control in all medias is very well documented. (911allo (talk) 16:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)).

You reference desk post
I have removed it. There's two issues of note here. Firstly, the reference desk is not for Wikipedia-related inquiries. If you're having a content dispute, please read WP:DR.

Secondly, you're expected to act in a civil manner here. Not doing so is a pretty good means of getting yourself blocked.

Thirdly, what conspiracy? There's a pyramid. It's in the photo. It's visible. I don't understand what's being hidden. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 02:02, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * And you're stating that The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is true on your userpage? Are you serious? Using your userpage for polemic statements is definitely frowned upon. Wikipedia is not a personal web hosting service, it's an online encyclopedia. I must kindly request that you do something about that bit and stop with this nonsense. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 02:15, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

You want to block me ? You don't need to threaten me about doing it, you already doing it!

I am sorry but a have a copy of the Protocols of Zion dated 1912 here on my desk. I read them many times and I see they predicted history since 1912 without a single error as far as I can say for being a fervent political activist. I don't care who wrote them since they predicted history. Were they written by a prophet ? By someone able to control history or by someone who just knew what was the agenda of another group ? It's irrelevant since they predicted what is going on today !


 * Okay, I have blocked you. 2 weeks, as all you seem to be doing is insulting other users (see WP:CIVIL) and making pointless polemical statements. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 22:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Insulting ? Is insulting defined by one refusing to see that an image shows a pyramid then being told he needs glasses since the picture in question does indeed shows a PYRAMID ?


 * Accusing others of being liars? I've linked to it several times and will do it again, please read Civility. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 04:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Zionist Bullshit
"I don't care about the (American) public opinion: I own the Congress". Ariel Sharon.

Ex war criminal as per UN.

I pronounce Wikipedia dead, cruxified by Zionists :)