User talk:919er

London Borough of Newham
Hi, notice you have been deleting text from this article without any edit summary. Any reason why you think this info is inaccurate or not needed?--Egghead06 (talk) 11:04, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Because it's either incorrect or no longer exists. Who are you anyway? 919er (talk) 11:17, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Please read WP:5PILLARS - changes need to have reliable sources and be verifiable.--Egghead06 (talk) 11:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

I have read that. Are you an administrator? I did ask who you are? You have put back incorrect information. North Woolwich Museum was closed years ago so does NOT exist. Bus routes 97 and 339 are now MISSING and have been Newham routes for at least a year. Eurostar does NOT run from Stratford International. Newham does NOT want to be advertised as a deprived borough, this is tantramount to insulting the residents. My object was to correct wrong information. I am a reliable source - I live here. As the page is now it is incorrect and misleading. Not much use. 919er (talk) 13:52, 1 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Maybe you have misunderstood. I am not saying don't change anything but......changes should be referenced with references that anyone can verify. Living there is all very well but can others verify what you enter? As for the feelings of the locals the details of the poverty of the area was referenced so as to back up this statement. If you believe that reference to be inaccurate please provide one which contradicts it or, at least, take the subject to the articles TALK page - always better than just deleting something you don't like, especially if that something carries a reference.--Egghead06 (talk) 15:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

OK - I'll try again with references. On the question of poverty - the statement "The local authority is Newham London Borough Council, the second most deprived in England.[2]" .. is just plainly wrong! The council are not deprived, some of the residents are. It needs correcting because it's just worded wrong, you can hardly have a reference for that.

Nomination of Sverre Harrfeldt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sverre Harrfeldt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sverre Harrfeldt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Jen yir e2  20:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)