User talk:91bm

July 2023
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Decentralized finance. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 06:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, I have diligently enhanced the article by including links to credible sources that support the facts mentioned. I specifically focused on providing proper citations for several paragraphs to ensure the article's reliability and credibility. To further contribute to the Wikipedia community, I will thoroughly review the external links guideline to identify any areas for improvement and ensure I adhere to the guidelines.
 * My motivation for this effort comes from a genuine desire to improve my copywriting skills. I find it gratifying to reference reliable sources while adding valuable information to Wikipedia, complementing existing articles with missing pieces of knowledge. Your provided information has been invaluable, and I sincerely appreciate it. Rest assured, I will diligently take note of your advice as I continue to contribute to the platform. Thank you for supporting my endeavor. 91bm (talk) 08:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC)


 * You're still adding excessively promotional content. Please carefully review Paid-contribution disclosure if you are compensated for editing. If you are compensated for editing, you must disclose this per Wikipedia's terms of use. Even if you are not compensated for editing, you may still have a conflict of interst, in which case please read Conflict of interest before editing further. Even if you do not have a conflict of interest, please note that Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 05:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, I presume that this message is related to the edits I made on one of the bibliographies. I will proceed not to edit anymore of the bibliography and will try to keep my tone in neutral and avoid any promotional contents. I will keep that in mind and try not to repeat the same mistakes. Thank you for the guidance. 91bm (talk) 03:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * What "bibliographies" are you talking about?
 * I am mainly concerned with your addition of unreliable sources and your repeated use of inappropriate tone to add promotional material. What is more confusing is that you are adding this material to articles which are already tagged as having problems with promotional content.
 * Please carefully review Reliable sources. Please also carefully review Paid-contribution disclosure. Finally, please do not contribute content which was generated by artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT or similar. Grayfell (talk) 04:59, 22 July 2023 (UTC)