User talk:92.1.205.192

Greenock and sourcing
Hi - I appreciate what you're saying about it being speculative, but you can't insert commentary on sources without having another source. What you want is a more recent, reliable source, criticising Smith's viewpoint. Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  16:58, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * That is a completely inappropriate demand. The is no expectation that one amateur writer writing in the 1920s would be rebutted, and I did not remove the claim. 92.1.205.192 (talk) 17:01, 7 April 2019 (UTC)