User talk:92.104.174.113

December 2023
Hello, I'm Matrix. I noticed that you removed topically relevant content from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''The person is clearly of public interest as the CEO of a pharma company, with reliable sources talking about the incident. Please discuss on the talk page of both articles before removing information. — MATRIX! (a good person!)''&#91;citation unneeded&#93; 21:01, 9 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Actually the truth is that this person wasn't even an employee of Vertex and the event happened 8 years ago in connection with a dress up party. Whilst the person showed very poor judgement, this person is neither a person of public interest, but was just any odd contractor, who got in the middle of an ugly divorce - so rather than trying to destroy a person's life, be the good person as you claim you are and delete this. 92.104.174.113 (talk) 01:32, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Feel free to discuss on the Talk page of the article, but stop vandalizing the article. The topis has been extensively discussed. All mentioned facts are proven by multiple reliable citations. What you state (age of the photo, divorce, etc) has no basis and no source, it's your claim. Wikipedia relies on sources, not on (anonymous) claims. MarcoMiller2 (talk) 18:45, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I have now concluded intensive research on this topic. Your claims ("ugly divorce", "8 years ago", "dress up party") have no factual basis, they are mentioned nowhere, not in a single source. Another user even mentioned a "wedding", for which there are as well no sources at all.
 * So please stop these claims, all of this is irrelevant to Wikipedia. MarcoMiller2 (talk) 19:47, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Please live out your 'data privacy' phantasies elsewhere, for example in the German-language version of this article, where the name is not mentioned. Again: This is Wikipedia, which is not censored in any way. No invidivual, organisation or even government can suppress information on its own will from Wikipedia. Wikipedia follows a collaborative approach, it is the community that decides about relevance. Also, Wikipedia is fact- and source-based.
 * The community's view on this topic is clear and undeniable: Millions of people worldwide have reacted to the outrageous antisemitic incident and have liked, reposted or commented on it.
 * Apart from that, the alleged time and alleged background of the photo, which you claim (without any sources), is irrelevant. The section is about the event in November 2023, the exposure of Waygood by StopAntisemitism, the public outcry, the international media attention, his immediate firing and the public statement by his former employer, mentioning his name. The event with bibliographical relevance is not Waygood's Hakenkreuz armband posing on social media itself, but the events that unfolded and were caused by his actions. Probably more people pose with antisemitic armbands or issue hate-speech remarks, every day, and also some of them are posted publicly on social media every day, which would not be relevant to Wikipedia. But in contrast to all of them, this single incident has made it to international media attention.
 * In short: All social media Hakenkreuz posers are not relevant to Wikipedia - but Richard Waygood is, because of the outcome of his actions.
 * Furthermore, also the reactions in this discussion (on StopAntisemitism and Vertex Pharmaceuticals talk pages) show how relevant the section is, as it causes a lively and extended discussion, in contrast to many other people mentioned in this article.
 * Also, as mentioned many times before, this smells similar to a very big conflict of interest, als multiple accounts constantly try to suppress Richard Waygood's information from the articles. Gooficous Goof (talk) 06:12, 11 December 2023 (UTC)